Alexander I, Ivan F. Kruzenshtern, Yuri F. Lisyansky, Nikolai P. Rezanov. Polycentrism of a successf - Страница 14

Whether was rational мотивировка троецентрия?

Probably, it is possible to speak about the following rational substantiations трехцентричного of management:

(1) Priorities of embassy (state task).

The note: after ' wars of nerves ' and self-isolation Н. Item. Резанова at itself in a cabin the management of expedition(dispatch) becomes двуцентричным де факто.

Двуцентричным де юре the management of expedition(dispatch) becomes from the moment of end of attempts of accommodation of embassy in Japan, оставления Резановым "of 'Hope" (1805) and direction Н. Item. Резанова in Russia through Siberia (in ways Н. Item. Резанов has died of illness in 1807).

Полицентричность (двуцентричность) "'обнуляется" after an output(exit) from Кантона and passage by the ships of cape of Kind Hope. The ships have lost each other from a kind, and further moved independently from each other on various trajectories.

(2) Полицентричность promoted взаимодополнению. In the certain periods of navigation (both captains are especial in the initial period) worked in common, that allowed the beginning captains (rather beginning) to lean(base) on cooperation and mutual aid, accumulating experience. In foreign ports two ships looked more solidly, than one.

(3) Полицентричность provided the mutual control.

(4) Полицентричность formed an atmosphere соревновательности. Though aspiration Ю. Ф. Лисянского to independent navigation soon after passage of cape of Kind Hope also can cause some questions, it, this aspiration, was programmed itself полицентричностью of management of expedition(dispatch).

' Intense conditions created from behind the claims Резанова, ... ' exhausts forces human '. In Петропавловске on Kamchatka Крузенштерн was going to hand over командование by courts to other officers. It was the ultimatum.

In the letter to the sea minister of item. In. Чичагову Лисянский wrote: ' Предпринявши вояж around of light under командою of my friend, ... I токмо expected minute of this important subject, but in islands Маркизских all has turned to dream. There. Резанов has announced to us publicly, that it(he) is our chief. Рисковавши every minute by life for glory ours государя and Fatherland, whether it was possible to us to expect командующего of the so important expedition(dispatch), which before сим did not see almost sea? ' The Commander "of 'Neva" has addressed to the Main government Российско of the American company and to the minister of commerce Румянцеву with the request to dismiss it(him) from командования by a vessel ' or to exclude from command from which, except for the unfortunate end of all our works nothing can be expected '. However applications Крузенштерна and Лисянского about a resignation were not taken into account. Румянцев, at which the documents враждующих of the parties converged, not only has not made neither envoy, nor officers of any reproach, but even has taken care of, that they have received the awards. In comparison with success of navigation of the ships from Kronstadt to Kamchatka and северо this quarrel was represented to western coast of America not so already by significant event. Румянцев did not consider(count) Крузенштерна as the originator of misunderstanding. Moreover, Румянцев has made Крузенштерна by the scientific adviser on sea and polar researches and has kept the friendly attitudes(relations) with it(him) about last days of the life ' [Пасецкий In. М.].

It is complex(difficult) to tell, in what has constrained Н. Item Резанов And. Ф. Крузенштерна (but nevertheless instructions(indication) of the man not having sea experience and sea intuition, could be constraining).

Naturally, the instructions(indication) of the man not having sea experience which is not understanding of importance of special knowledge and seaworthy intuition, could be dangerous. In this sense And. Ф. Крузенштерн struggled for freedom of actions of the commander, for safe and successful navigation.

But to it общепонятным the reasons can add still such reflections.

That would be, if the expedition(dispatch) has come back in structure of two courts and with Н. Item. Резановым onboard one of them?

What name she(it) would receive? Round-the-world expedition(dispatch) Резанова? Резанова Крузенштерна? Резанова Крузенштерна Лисянского?

Гиперболизируя and dreaming, it is possible to tell, that on кону there was a place in a history.

So, the game went for important things:

(1) For safety of navigation,

(2) For успешность of navigation (not of ambassadorial mission and not компанейской - economic - mission), namely for success of round-the-world navigation and scientifically познавательной of mission.

(3) For a place in a history.

The sphynx is mysterious усмехнулся: ' Play! Your figures are your successes. Win! '

Energy соревновательности and creation of success

Certainly, полицентричность creates a specific psychological situation.

To retell in the given sketch the information, which is stated in sources concerning mutual relation And. Ф. Крузенштерна and Н. Item. Резанова, it is not expedient.

Let's note only culmination moments.

It is curious, that by one of the culminations the conflict has reached(achieved) after an output(exit) in Silent ocean, passage of a significant distance at Silent ocean, but before arrival on Kamchatka (and in Japan), and prior to the beginning separate плаваний "of 'Hope" (to Japan and Kamchatka) and "'Neva" (to Alaska).

To this moment ("'Hope" and "'Neva" were in area of the Hawaiian islands) steel (1) qualifications of the captains, (2) real prospects of success of round-the-world navigation are clear.

As to the ambassador Н. Item. Резанова, it(he) was still ' a thing in itself(himself) ', on any achievement or successes it(he) still refer could not.

И. Ф. Крузенштерн used stated Н. Item. Резановым in relation to it(him) (Крузенштерну) a word "'ребячитесь" for organization of collective trial (with participation Лисянского and representatives of officer structure "of 'Hope" and "'Neva").

' - the Economic businesses at all not your competence, приказчики exchange компанейские subjects. - Резанов slightly усмехнулся. - Is thought, it for you is not solid and is complete to you ребячиться.

Крузенштерн оторопело has stared on Резанова, the person it(him) became crimson, and it(he) has screamed:

- How you смеете how you смеете how you ребячусь?! ' [Фирсов And. И.].

From sources follows, that Ю. Ф. Лисянский has supported And. Ф. Крузенштерна.

И. Ф. Крузенштерн aggravates a situation up to a limit at the moment of collective trial of a word "'ребячитесь". In the conflict is involved Ю. Ф. Лисянский. Резанов shows the document signed personally by the emperor Александром I. Ю. Ф. Лисянский in запале makes inappropriate words: that the emperor did not write it, but only has signed.

' Is who wrote? - has asked Лисянский, looking on Резанова in an emphasis.

(...)

- Yes who wrote that? - has repeated Лисянский.

(...)

- That that also is! - has told Лисянский ironically. - we want to know, who wrote, and to sign ... it(he) all will sign. It is known to us ... ' [Штейнберг Е. Л.].

Like, Н. Item. Резанов - having received such opportunity - officially has informed(notified) of St. Petersburg on words Ю. Ф. Лисянского.

Formally Н. Item. Резанов of the rights, declaring about the powers, this correctness recognize all. But there is a psychological inertia: the officers possess experience of a sea service, and by the ship it is accepted единоначалие, the captain solely supervises over the ship.

Н. Item. Резанов or there is no right to displace the captain (such prospect arises only after arrival "of 'Hope" on Kamchatka), or there is no on it a determination, or simply is not able it to make (it(he) the man not naval). The officer structure is picked up personally Крузенштерном, some members of crew are it(him) (Крузенштерна) the relatives. Крузенштерн fairly announces to officer structure, that it(he) - commander of the ship, and that it(he) takes the responsibility for the conflict with Н. Item. Резановым on itself. The imperial document on powers Резанова is announced, it(he) (imperial document) is formally recognized, but in a rule(situation) Н. Item. Резанова it a little that changes, it(he) continues navigation in isolation.