Alexander I, Ivan F. Kruzenshtern, Yuri F. Lisyansky, Nikolai P. Rezanov. Polycentrism of a successf - Страница 15

The psychological pressure has appeared so strong, that the further way (up to Kamchatka) Н. Item. Резанов has done, самоизолировавшись, in the cabin.

' The Explanation was held, but simplification it has not brought. Резанов did not leave the cabin up to itself Петропавловска ' [Фирсов And. И.].

Nevertheless, after that conflict occur not so appreciable, but extremely important changes in a rule(situation) and in moods And. Ф. Крузенштерна and Ю. Ф. Лисянского.

Е. Л. Штейнберг is art - but is extreme realistic - домысливает of a word Крузенштерна and Лисянского:

' All this I take on myself, - has told Крузенштерн ... - ... пройдя third of way, owe we it(him) with glory finish ... whatever happened and on what victims it would be not necessary to go!

Лисянский has come back to "'Neva" in gloomy mood. (...)

- Yes! The officer has told aloud. - Крузенштерн of the rights: the travel needs to be finished with glory ... that happened! ' [Штейнберг Е. Л.].

Even in morning Ю. Ф. Лисянский was the person rather who has been not involved in the conflict Крузенштерна with Резановым. But, having stated careless words about the emperor in an exciting atmosphere of collective trial organized And. Ф. Крузенштерном, it(he) (Лисянский) should strain all forces for some kind of rehabilitations, ' on what victims it would be not necessary to go ', ' whatever happened '. The started mechanism троецентрия has worked: at Ю. Ф. Лисянского did not remain of other output(exit) except for obvious, distinct(clear) and indisputable success.

Still ahead were also thin diplomatic course And. Ф. Крузенштерна with initial call on Kamchatka, and relative failure of embassy, and decision Н. Item. Резанова to leave from the ship "'Hope", and the not holding meeting Резанова with "'Neva" on Alaska, but already in a latent kind has appeared - yet not formulated decision Ю. Ф. Лисянского, in the obvious form accepted later, at cape of Kind Hope - is independent, with the greatest possible speed to arrive in Kronstadt. INDEPENDENTLY! BY FIRST!

There is a question, on which there is no unequivocal answer: what variant actually would be is more safe? Variant joint or variant of separate navigation?

And unless the arrival one - anyone them two - ship would not become success in eyes of the emperor Александра I? Even under condition of неприбытия second? The world(global) experience allowed to believe: the safe end of a sea campaign even by one of the ships would indoubtedly be estimated as successful end of expedition(dispatch). But successfully both ships arrived!!! (' we owe it(him) with glory finish ... whatever happened and on what victims it would be not necessary to go! '). All has passed was successful (from this that in the competence of the captains): both navigation, and military help Российско of the American company, both trade, and research! Russia became in one number(line) with conducting world(global) sea державами. (' Instead of whether early in Куки, young man? ' (From words of the ambassador Воронцова. Цит. On [Штейнберг Е. Л.]).

But while the ship Крузенштерна "'Hope" is directed to Japan.

Magnificent дипломатичный a course Крузенштерна: Иван Федорович changes a sequence of achievement of the purposes. At first not delivery of embassy in Japan. At first visiting of Kamchatka. Мотивировка difficultly challenged: it is necessary urgently to deliver cargoes to Kamchatka. In first, the representatives of the Company expect cargoes, in second, the conditions of navigation can change. Н. Item. Резанов is compelled to agree.

Резанов is morally disorganized, in Петропавловске ' begins to let out of pairs ', the official trial begins. Крузенштерну the discharge threatens, but Крузенштерн does(makes) a new powerful diplomatic step: apologizes.

Н. Item. Резанов,maybe, also would like it(him) to discharge, but terms do not allow: the situation will be tightened(delayed). She(it) and so is tightened(delayed): unforeseen time stood, were under repair, in Brasil, unforeseen transition in Петропавловск (instead of Japan).

It is necessary to hasten with embassy.

The captains already have shown the qualification, and it was clear, that the success of expedition(dispatch) is real.

Н. Item. Резанов be praised by any achievement on the moment of trial of the conflict on Kamchatka could not.

If it is valid in Brasil Н. Item. Резанов sent the reports on "'disobedience" of the captains in St. Petersburg, it(he) could expect with what that of reaction, having arrived on Kamchatka. (This judgement, certainly, presumable. The author has no the information on speed of moving of the items of mail).

But in any case, the information sources do not contain the items of information on reception Н. Item. Резановым on What Kamchatka or distinct(clear) answers from St. Petersburg on the reports rather "of 'disobedience" of the captains.

Threat of the captains by a resignation and not obvious reaction имперского of a management(manual) on the messages Н. Item. Резанова were one of латентно of culmination items of expedition(dispatch).

Н. Item. Резанов has understood, that it is necessary ' to hand over back '.

Н. Item. Резанов accepts apologies And. Ф. Крузенштерна. The embassy terminates in relative failure. The Japanese emperor gifts has not accepted, to an establishment of the diplomatic attitudes(relations) has not agreed. In general(common), in it there was with no what that of especial failure. The policy(politics) of Japan was those in that time. As far as Japan in that time "'дистанцировалась" from all European countries (short of Holland) is possible to judge.

Failure of embassy - if those has happened at once after the conflict with Крузенштерном - Резанов could interpret on any other business, including having readdressed what that a share of the responsibility Крузенштерну. But formal reconciliation on Kamchatka was held. At Рязанова there were no bases and occasion in what that to reproach Крузенштерна.

Certainly, for success of embassy in Russia hoped, but, on the other hand, for anybody were not secrets policy(politics) and position of Japan. Most likely, the emperor Александр I took into consideration an opportunity неуспеха as rather real. And the results of ambassadorial mission have not upset it(him).

Intolerant conditions by the ship around Н. Item. Резанова, relative failure of embassy. Н. Item. Резанов it appears in a role of the unlucky ambassador. Objectively it(him) to reproach there is nothing. Н. Item. Резанов moves down from the ship (1805). Is directed on Alaska. There - "'Neva". Ю. Ф. Лисянский learns(finds out) about speed arrival Н. Item. Резанова. But the time does not suffer(bear). Лисянский hastens in China, in Кантон.

Н. Item. Резанов remains on Alaska. Remains in a rule(situation) of the man with double problems (1) history of the conflict by the ship and (2) fact of relative failure of embassy.

Н. Item. Резанов comes back through Siberia in St. Petersburg.

Objectively it(he) in anything is not guilty. Also it was formal it(him) to accuse there is nothing. The man with smaller vanity,maybe, and more easy would experience a situation.

Naturally, the rule(situation) of the man not seeked success, does not add vital forces. In ways Н. Item. Резанов dies (1807).

So, Н. Item. Резанов from expedition(dispatch) 'has "left".

Let's return to And. Ф. Крузенштерну and Ю. Ф. Лисянскому.

The meeting in Кантоне, and after the decision of trade tasks in Кантоне - joint navigation in Санкт of St. Petersburg is necessary them (bending around cape of Kind Hope).

And at presence on "'Hope" Н. Item. Резанова, and in his(its) absence the psychological mechanism троецентрия, given in action by a wise Sphynx, continues successfully to work in a direction of creation of success.